<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Prioritization on My New Hugo Project</title>
    <link>https://ad1tya-tech.pages.dev/tags/prioritization/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Prioritization on My New Hugo Project</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ad1tya-tech.pages.dev/tags/prioritization/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The Kano Model: Why Features &#34;Expire&#34; and How to Stay Ahead</title>
      <link>https://ad1tya-tech.pages.dev/posts/2026/01/2026-01-07-the-kano-model-why-features-expire-and-how-to-stay-ahead/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ad1tya-tech.pages.dev/posts/2026/01/2026-01-07-the-kano-model-why-features-expire-and-how-to-stay-ahead/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;the-gravity-of-expectations&#34;&gt;The Gravity of Expectations&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Product Management would be easy if customer expectations stayed static. But they don&amp;rsquo;t. Customer satisfaction is a &lt;strong&gt;Hedonic Treadmill&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The moment you ship a revolutionary feature, the clock starts ticking. Competitors copy it. Users get used to it. The magic fades. To understand this lifecycle, we use the &lt;strong&gt;Kano Model&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h1 id=&#34;the-3-categories-of-features&#34;&gt;The 3 Categories of Features&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1. The Basics (Must-Haves)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Definition:&lt;/em&gt; These are non-negotiable.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Trap:&lt;/em&gt; You get &lt;strong&gt;Zero Credit&lt;/strong&gt; for doing them well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prioritize Like a Pro: Mastering Your Product Roadmap</title>
      <link>https://ad1tya-tech.pages.dev/posts/2024/06/2024-06-04-prioritize-like-a-pro-mastering-your-product-roadmap/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ad1tya-tech.pages.dev/posts/2024/06/2024-06-04-prioritize-like-a-pro-mastering-your-product-roadmap/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A well-defined product roadmap acts as your guiding light, outlining the features you plan to build and the order in which you&amp;rsquo;ll develop them. But before you can map the path, you need to prioritize the destinations. Here&amp;rsquo;s where prioritization frameworks come in – structured methods that help you objectively evaluate backlog items and make informed decisions about what to build first.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Popular prioritization frameworks that I use are:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Value vs. Effort Matrix:&lt;/strong&gt; This simple yet powerful tool is a great starting point. It visually depicts features on a grid based on their perceived &lt;strong&gt;value&lt;/strong&gt; (impact on users and business) and the &lt;strong&gt;effort&lt;/strong&gt; required to develop them. Features in the high-value, low-effort quadrant are ideal candidates for early development, while those requiring high effort but offering low perceived value might need further justification or even removal.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
