<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Onboarding on My New Hugo Project</title>
    <link>https://ad1tya-tech.pages.dev/tags/onboarding/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Onboarding on My New Hugo Project</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ad1tya-tech.pages.dev/tags/onboarding/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Hyperbolic Discounting: Why Users Quit Before They See the Value</title>
      <link>https://ad1tya-tech.pages.dev/posts/2026/02/2026-02-11-hyperbolic-discounting-why-users-quit-before-they-see-the-value/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ad1tya-tech.pages.dev/posts/2026/02/2026-02-11-hyperbolic-discounting-why-users-quit-before-they-see-the-value/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;the-future-self-is-a-stranger&#34;&gt;The &amp;ldquo;Future Self&amp;rdquo; is a Stranger&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Neurologically, when you think about your &amp;ldquo;Future Self&amp;rdquo; (e.g., You in 5 years), your brain lights up in the same area as when you think about &lt;strong&gt;a complete stranger&lt;/strong&gt;. We don&amp;rsquo;t empathize with our future selves. This is why we procrastinate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Present Self:&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;ldquo;I don&amp;rsquo;t want to do the dishes. I want to watch TV.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Future Self:&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;ldquo;I will have to do the dishes tomorrow.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Zeigarnik Effect: Why 99% Complete is More Powerful Than 100%</title>
      <link>https://ad1tya-tech.pages.dev/posts/2026/02/2026-02-11-the-zeigarnik-effect-why-99-complete-is-more-powerful-than-100/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ad1tya-tech.pages.dev/posts/2026/02/2026-02-11-the-zeigarnik-effect-why-99-complete-is-more-powerful-than-100/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h4 id=&#34;the-psychology-of-the-cliffhanger&#34;&gt;The Psychology of the &amp;ldquo;Cliffhanger&amp;rdquo;&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bluma Zeigarnik proved that people remember uncompleted or interrupted tasks &lt;strong&gt;90% better&lt;/strong&gt; than completed ones. This is why you remember the one bug you couldn&amp;rsquo;t fix on Friday afternoon all weekend, but you forget the 10 bugs you fixed on Monday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &amp;ldquo;Open Loop&amp;rdquo; creates a state of mild anxiety. The only way to relieve the anxiety is to return and finish the task.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h4 id=&#34;how-to-weaponize-this-in-product-design&#34;&gt;How to Weaponize This in Product Design&lt;/h4&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1. The &amp;ldquo;Almost Done&amp;rdquo; Progress Bar (LinkedIn)&lt;/strong&gt; LinkedIn is the master of this. For years, users saw a &amp;ldquo;Profile Strength&amp;rdquo; meter. It would get stuck at &amp;ldquo;Intermediate.&amp;rdquo; Users would spend hours endorsing strangers and adding obscure skills just to get that bar to &amp;ldquo;All-Star.&amp;rdquo; &lt;strong&gt;The Trick:&lt;/strong&gt; If they showed no bar, nobody would care. By showing a &lt;em&gt;partial&lt;/em&gt; bar, they created a Zeigarnik itch.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The IKEA Effect: Why We Love the Products We Build ourselves (And How to Use It)</title>
      <link>https://ad1tya-tech.pages.dev/posts/2025/12/2025-12-25-the-ikea-effect-why-we-love-the-products-we-build-ourselves-and-how-to-use-it/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ad1tya-tech.pages.dev/posts/2025/12/2025-12-25-the-ikea-effect-why-we-love-the-products-we-build-ourselves-and-how-to-use-it/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h1 id=&#34;the-wobbly-bookshelf-paradox&#34;&gt;The Wobbly Bookshelf Paradox&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a strange paradox in human psychology. We hate work, but we love the fruits of our labor. Researchers Dan Ariely, Michael Norton, and Daniel Mochon dubbed this the &lt;strong&gt;&amp;ldquo;IKEA Effect.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In their experiments, they found that people who built a simple LEGO set valued it significantly higher than people who were just handed the completed set. The act of creation—even a simple, guided one—creates a cognitive bias. We assume that anything we spent time on must be valuable.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
